Reflective
Practice
The purpose of my visual investigation and
first two essays was to explore how and why brands use celebrity endorsements
within their advertisements. The quote I responded to for the first essay was a
discussion about capitalism and consumerism; therefore choosing to study big
corporate companies and how they advertise seemed only appropriate in response
to this quote. The essays and visual response focus heavily on Pepsi as a
brand, particularly how in 2012, they paid Beyoncé $50 million for a partnership
deal in the hope it would expand her creative ambitions within her music
career. The intention for my visual investigation was to create a set of
advertisements using similar techniques of culture jamming used by Ad Busters,
a form of activism that attacks large corporate businesses to tell the truth,
rather than the distorted views shown to the public by these companies. It was
important to consider what impact these adverts would have when presented to a
consumer audience because they are the ones buying products from the company,
so making them feel uncomfortable or in shock when presented with the
information was a significant factor. When researching into celebrity
endorsements used by companies, it was immediately made clear that consumers
would be more drawn into a product if there was a celebrity on the front, ‘Branding enables
us to define ourselves in terms of a shorthand that is immediately
comprehensible to the world around us.’ (Olins, 2004, p27) Advertising is a way
of manipulation, filled with a false sense of identity for the consumer, making
this clear in the way the adverts were created would allow the individual to
reconsider Pepsi’s intentions. By including typography on the advertisements it
allowed the important information to become wider known by the public, the $50
million was always going to be a shocking amount to any consumer as, ‘Brands
are increasingly disingenuous and duplicitous in their relentless pursuit of
our money and they will stop at nothing in their overwhelming imperative to
manipulate us.’ (Patterson, 2006, p215) With the play on words of Beyoncé’s
Flawless song, (I woke up like this cos Pepsi paid me $50 million) it gave the
adverts an interesting approach in terms of connecting with the wide audience,
without them being just dull and informative. The typography used on the
adverts is Futura, used by artist Barbara Kruger and the guerilla girls, not
only does this like to contextual research and the visual analysis essay, it
allows the advertisements to have a strong, lasting impression on passers by as
bold typography is used for high impact and standing out against others. During
the design process, the consideration of the target audience was always a high
priority, alongside where the adverts would actually be placed. The target
audience was tricky to define completely because Pepsi are a company that don’t
always target a small age group, more along the lines of 18-40, with this in
mind it meant there were not many limitations of the adverts contents but the
inclusion of Beyoncé is more likely to catch the attention of a younger
audience. This would not be considered a problem as the advertisements are
designed to be on large billboards in busy cities like Leeds and London,
therefore a high percentage of 18-30 year olds would pay close attention to
them and look at themselves as consumers within this capitalist society. When
it came to designing the initial prototypes, it was imminently clear that
relying on Pepsi’s existing packaging would not be as successful as thinking
outside of the box and not going for the obvious, although Ad Busters almost
re-brand adverts, it was important to stay away from this and not copy their
ideas otherwise it would become un-original. From the group critique exercises
on the prototypes, it was suggested to include imagery from Beyoncé’s music
videos or existing posters; this was an interesting approach because the main
aim was to address the flaws within Pepsi, especially its advertising. However,
using imagery of Beyoncé within the advertisements highlighted the fact her
celebrity status was being taken advantage of in order for Pepsi to make money.
Due to Beyoncé’s high celebrity status, it creates another argument that, ‘Nothing
would be consumed unless the marketplace arouse and seduce consumerist desires.’
(Bauman, 1999, p395) Therefore trying to almost play on this with the
advertisements created for the outcomes meant the inclusion of Beyoncé imagery
will attract the attention of the public, almost forcing them to pay attention
and read the adverts, playing to the ‘mainstream commercial culture’ (Olins, 2004,
p207) Olins states due to brandings nature changing.
Overall, there is a clear link between each piece
of work produced for this module, the initial quote allowed the theme of
capitalism and consumerism to be explored 'Although on
the surface the nature of design may appear to be relatively inconsequential,
it might well be said to play a formative role in the history of capitalism
and, in turn, in the social expression of capitalist practices.' The main theme
that carries through each piece of work is how brands use celebrity
endorsements within their advertising in order to create maximum profit.
Through this, the exploration of consumerism within the 21st century
has played a huge part and the research into Pepsi and their advertisement
strategies has been beneficial in order to back up the points being made and
overall the advertisements produced. The relations of the written pieces
compared to the visual outcomes are a success as they closely link ideas and
research carried out into aspects like culture jamming and Ad Busters, in order
for them to have maximum impact on the everyday consumer.
No comments:
Post a Comment